That could shut out people who don't have the resources to hire experts.Īnd whether inside or outside the courtroom, denying that real events actually occurred has corrosive effects. "If lawyers start to get juries to demand all the bells and whistles to prove that a piece of evidence is not a fake.that is a way for lawyers and for their clients who are seeking to downplay or dismiss damning evidence against them to essentially run up the bills and make it more expensive, more time-consuming for the other side to get that damning piece of evidence admitted," she said. Technology We asked the new AI to do some simple rocket science. In Musk's case, the judge did not buy his lawyers' claims. So far, courts aren't buying claims of deepfaked evidence "Put simply: a skeptical public will be primed to doubt the authenticity of real audio and video evidence," Chesney and Citron wrote. The idea is, as people become more aware of how easy it is to fake audio and video, bad actors can weaponize that skepticism. The liar's dividend is a term coined by law professors Bobby Chesney and Danielle Citron in a 2018 paper laying out the challenges deepfakes present to privacy, democracy, and national security. "That's exactly what we were concerned about: that when we entered this age of deepfakes, anybody can deny reality," said Hany Farid, a digital forensics expert and professor at the University of California, Berkeley. Policymakers can't keep upīut the unleashing of powerful generative AI to the public is also raising concerns about another phenomenon: that as the technology becomes more prevalent, it will become easier to claim that anything is fake. Untangling Disinformation AI-generated deepfakes are moving fast.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |